London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Sutton and Cheam 1943

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Sutton and Cheam]

This page requires JavaScript

ERADICATION OF BED BUGS.

Twenty-seven bug- infosted houses were dealt with as

follows:-

By the use of
InsecticidesSulphurHydrocyanic (H.C.N.)Gas
Council Houses3--
Other houses24-

The work of disinfection has continued to be carried
cut upon the lines indicated in previous Reports.
The Insecticides used were "rexam T.C.Y." and "Fuminol".
SHOP'S ACT, 1934,
Two hundred and thirty-five visits were made in
connection with Section 10 of the Shops Act, 1934.
PREVALENCE OP AND CONTROL OVER INFECTIOUS DISEASES
One thousand two hundred and seventy one cases of
infectious disease were notified during the year. Of
these six hundred and fifty seven were cases of Measles
which was epidemic from January to July, and four hundred
and forty one were cases of scarlet Fever, which sustained
a high prevalence throughout the year. There was a further
decline in Diphtheria. Two cases of Typhoid Fever and
one case of Paratyphoid Fever were notified but there was
no evidence of infection arising within this district.
There were four sporadic cases of cerebro Spinal Fever,
and there was one case of Acute Anterior Poliomyelitis.
SCARLET FEVER the increase in the number of cases
of Scarlet Fever at the end of 1942 was sustained during
194,3. This rise in incidence corresponded to a phase
of higher virulence of the causative organism, the
streptococcus, which affected urban areas throughout the
country. In this Borough four hundred and forty one
cases'-were notified compared with one hundred and
sixty two during the previous year. The case rate was
6.17 per 1000 of copulation compared with 3.01 per 1000
of copulation for England and Wales. There was no
increase in the severity of the disease. Most of the
cases were very mild and there was no death. The
increased infectivity was demonstrated by a rapid
progression of cases in schools, a higher rate of residual
infection in cases discharged from hospital, and a larger
number of secondary cases in the homes. The mildness
of the initial symptoms and the transient nature of the
rash tended to allay suspicion of infection and to delay
isolation of the patients. The spread of infection was
(19)