London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Richmond upon Thames 1968

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Richmond]

This page requires JavaScript

informed of the provisions of the Food and Drugs Act relating to false and misleading
description and, on being advised, they ensured that the eggs were correctly designated.
During the year four hundred and seventy four samples were submitted for
chemical analysis and of these twenty two were considered to be irregular. Eighteen
samples of specified foods were also submitted for analysis in connection with the
national scheme carried out for the second year for the purpose of ascertaining the
presence of residual pesticides in foodstuffs.

The following table shows the types of samples analysed and the results obtained:

Article.Number AnalysedNumber Irregular
Artificial Sweeteners8
Baking Powders5
Beverages20
Cereals1
Drinks and Drink Ingredients436
Drugs and Medicines391
Farinaceous Products151
Fats and Oils101
Fish and Fish Products13
Flavourings and Essences12
Flour and Flour Confectionery401
Food Collourings62
Fruit and Fruit Products21
Jellies and Gelatine13
Marzipan10
Meat and Meat Products643
Milk and Milk Products27
Mustard7
Pickles and Sauces171
Preserves151
Salad Cream and Mayonnaise112
Savoury Spreads5
Spices and Herbs (Seasonings)282
Sugar Confectionery and Products19
Vegetable and Vegetable Products ..15
Miscellaneous101
Total47422

The irregular samples comprised :
(a) Concentrate Light Ale, Yeast Starter Pac\, Rose Hip Conserve, Tomato
Ketchup, Onion Salt, Vitamin Yeast Food. These products were not labelled in accordance
with the requirements of the Labelling of Food Order, 1953, but after representations
to the respective manufacturers suitable labels were introduced.
(b) Blackcurrant Drin\.
This sample was reported upon as irregular as it contained a preservative in excess
of the maximum prescribed by the Preservatives in Food Regulations, 1962. The
manufacturers, and the local authority in whose district the product was manufactured,
were consulted. The cause of the irregularity was considered to be inadequate mixing
of the product in bulk before bottling.
(c) Blackcurrant Health Drin\.
Found to contain a preservative in excess of that prescribed by the Preservative in
Food Regulations, 1962. The manufacturers attributed the irregularity to temporarily
introducing a more speedy test for the presence of the preservative after batch storage.
As the test did not prove satifactory the manufacturers reverted to the standard
recognised test. A sample taken by the Local Authority in whose area the product
was manufactured was later reported upon as being satisfactory.
70