London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Twickenham 1936

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Twickenham]

This page requires JavaScript

The number of notifiable infectious disease which occurred during 1936 is. set out in the flollowing table. Cases in which the diagnosis was not confirmed no observation subsequent to notification are not included.

MonthDiphtheriaScarlet FeverPuerperal FeverPuerperal PyrexiaPneumonia PrimaryPneumonia InfluenzalOphthalmia NeonatorumErysipelasParatyphoidEncephalitis Lethargica __MalariaDysentery
January4112
February463
March721112
April312o
May3
June1711111
July131
August11
September12
October171111
November1511
December1722
TOTALS1462341082611

Infectious Disease, 1936. Ages at notification.

DiseaseUnder 11-22-33-44-55-1010-1515-2020-2525-3535 4545-6565, etc.Admitted to HospitalTotalDeaths
Diphtheria2161131314
Scarlet Fever114326132334114562
Puerperal Fever11123
Puerperal Pyrexia4241
Pneumonia :—
Primary1122221032
Influenzal2518
Ophthalmia Neonatorum22-
Erysipelas122136-
Acute Polio-myelitis
Encephalitis lethargica11-
Paratyphoid11

Scarlet Fever.
The general incidence of Scarlet Fever was low and the type of case mild. No death
resulted from this disease. Cases occurred during each month, the highest number of cases (11)
occurring during January.
During the last week in December, six cases occurred at Fortescue House School, where
approximately 135 boys between the ages of 9 and 14 are in residence. On January 8th, 1937,
the Dick Test (of susceptibility to scarlet fever) was applied and immunization of susceptibles
was commenced. Although this action was taken during 1937 it appears advisable for the sake
of continuity to include it in this report.
In all, 128 were Dick Tested, and of these 52 were found to be susceptible, and these received
four inoculations at fortnightly intervals. In three of the positive cases, who had only had time
to receive their first inoculation, signs of mild Scarlet Fever appeared, in one case one day, in one
case three days, and in one case five days after the inoculation. In no other susceptible child
who had been inoculated did the disease appear and the outbreak ceased.
The result was so striking that it justified the adoption of the procedure in similar
circumstances even when the outbreak has commenced.