Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Kingston-upon-Thames]
This page requires JavaScript
Food Hygiene Regulations, 1955,
In accordance with the request of the Minister of Health, the following is a tabulated statement of inspections made during the year of the various types of food premises.
Food Premises | No. of Premises | Visits |
---|---|---|
Bakehouses and Bakers' shops | 25 | 84 |
Dairies and Milk Shops | 25 | 47 |
Butchers | 40 | 221 |
Greengrocers and fruiterers | 89 | 94 |
Public Houses | ||
(a) Providing restaurant services | 17 | 23 |
(b) Not providing restaurant services | 41 | |
Fishmongers and Stalls | 16 | 69 |
Ice Cream Premises registered | 173 | 92 |
Grocers and general provisions | 132 | 207 |
Restaurants and Cafes | 69 | |
Kitchens and canteens (including factory, school and shop) | 35 | 431 |
Wholesale meat distribution depots | 6 | 112 |
Visits to food premises re unsound food | 151 | |
Open Market, Pood Stalls, Barrows | 815 | |
668 | 2,346 |
FOOD AND DRUGS ACT. 1955.
During the year, 102 samples were submitted to the Public Analyst
in accordance with the provisions of the Pood and Drugs Act, 1955 and
the Labelling of Pood Order and other relevant Orders and Regulations.
Seven samples were the subject of adverse comment and six of these
related to contraventions of the Labelling of Food Order, In all caees
new or amended labels were produced.
The remaining sample which was of T.T. Fasteurised Milk, was
deficient in milk fat but a formal follow-up sample yielded a
remarkably high fat content. This indicated that at the dairy in
question the milk was not being properly mixed prior to being cartoned.
The matter was taken up with the farmer concerned through the Milk
Marketing Board and there is every reason to believe that future samples
will be satisfactory.