London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Kensington 1888

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Kensington]

This page requires JavaScript

2
England and Wales, moreover, shows a decrease of 1.0 per 1,000,
compared with 1887, and was the lowest recorded in any year
since civil registration began in 1837.

The subjoined table shows the annual-death rate per 1,000 persons living, in each of the last eleven years, in Kensington, in London as a whole, and in all England:—

1888.1887.1886.1885.1884.1883.1882.1881.1880.1879.1878.
Kensington15.916.415.916.115.115.516.216 617.818.820.2
London18.519.619.919.720.320.421.421.221.722.623.1
W. Districts16.919.019.219.219.219.519.919.619.820.921.6
North „16.417.818.118.519.119.119.720.620.821.522.0
Central „27.226.023.623.023.823.223 923.223.426.025.1
East ,,21.122.523.322.523.024.125.324.224.325.525.0
South „17.318.619.118.519.819.420.720.521.321.823.0
England & Wales17.818.819319.019.619.519.618.920.520.721.6

The Registrar-General, in his "Annual Summary of Births,
Deaths, and Causes of Death in London," speaks of 1888 as " a
year of remarkably low rates; the marriage-rate and the deathrate
being each the lowest on record, and the birth-rate the
lowest since 1841." Referring to the low death-rate in 1886,
the Registrar-General made an observation, equally true in
regard to the still lower death-rate in 1888, to the effect that
the "marked decline in the death-iates of recent years," for the
decline has been continuous since 1882 (21.4)," has been doubtlessly
in some part due to the decline in the birth-rate, which
must have materially diminished the proportion of children
under five in the total population. Had the birth-rate in the
successive five years 1882-86 been equal to the birth-rate in the
ten years 1871-80, there would have been, as nearly as can be
estimated, some 50,000 more children under five living in 1886,
and as the mortality in this first life-period is high, the general
death-rate would have been raised, and at a rough estimate
would have been about 20.4, instead of being, as it was, 19.9.
It would still, therefore, have been exceptionally low." The
Registrar-General, as usual, has prepared a table showing
diminution or excess of deaths in 1888, compared with annual