London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Shoreditch 1912

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Shoreditch]

This page requires JavaScript

60
Two of the samples of rum contained water in excess, in 1 case to the extent
of 86 per cent. No proceedings were taken as it was found that notices to the effect
that the spirits sold were diluted were exhibited in the bars.
One of the samples of jelly cuttings contained 0'7 grains per pound of salicylic
acid as an added preservative.
Of the 2 samples of tinned salmon, 1 was genuine fish free from injurious ingredients,
but containing very little salmon. The other sample contained 0 32
grains of tin per pound.
The sample of baking powder contained 17-27 per cent, of sulphate of calcium,
being 15'81 per cent, of the sample in excess of the maximum recommended by
the Local Government Board as being allowable. It was, however, not deemed
advisable to take proceedings.
The samples of lard, pepper, separated milk, cocoa, jam, whisky, jelly, honey,
ground ginger, self-raising flour, arrowroot, beef dripping, and rice were all genuine.

The subjoined table shows a comparison of the results of the work under the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts during the years 1902-12 inclusive :—

Year.Number of Samples.Number of persons in the Borough to each sample.Number of samples adulterated.Percentage of sampler adulterated.Number of prosecutions instituted.Summonses withdrawn on account of warranties.Prosecutions proceeded with.Number of successful prosecutions.Fines and Costs.Amount paid to Public Analyst.
£s.d.£s.d.
190228142071253542524811790140100
190370716611215.86055551173116353100
190461218911017.956650461285030600
19055362159818.2572514723318026700
190652022412223.4442423410612626000
19075192239919.0364322767140259100
19085802009215.845..453911710029000
19095702009216.1762746925518627650
191057820013323.065..60499317627950
191157720014925.864..625818006278176
191258419010017.14814845172110281100

The percentage of samples found adulterated was somewhat below the average.
With reference to the convictions under the Acts during 1912, in 10 instances the
defendants had been once, in 4 instances twice, in 1 three times, and in 2
nstances five times previously convicted