London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Willesden 1934

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Willesden]

This page requires JavaScript

72
(2) Diphtheria.
The average length of detention of diphtheria patients is also approximately the same as
last year:—
1931—56.2 1933—42.0
1932—45.6 1934—42.1
(3) Other Diseases.
Average stay in hospital of patients suffering from " other diseases," 1931—1934:—
1931—29.3 1933—25.5
1932—27.2 1934—22.6
Cases Admitted from Other Authorities.
During the year 107 cases were admitted from Authorities other than the Borough of Willesden.
These may be tabulated as follows:—

Table No . 61.

Name of Authority.No. of Cases.Disease.No. of Cases.
Harrow Urban District Council34Erysipelas1
Scarlet Fever23
Diphtheria10
Middlesex County Council32Measles15
Diphtheria6
Erysipelas6
Scarlet Fever4
Ophthalmia Neonatorum1
Borough of Heston and Isleworth18Scarlet Fever8
Diphtheria6
Measles4
Borough of Ealing15Scarlet Fever7
Diphtheria7
Measles1
Wembley Urban District Council8Erysipelas8

A considerable number of cases referred for admission to Hospital by outside Authorities had
to be refused as no beds were available for their accommodation. The amount of income derived
from the maintenance of these patients during the year was £1,855 6s. 4d. The corresponding figures
for last year were—Number of patients 51, amount of income £1,211 2s. Od.
Schick Test and Active Immunisation Against Diphtheria.
(1) Nursing Staff.
During 1926 a commencement was made in Schick Testing the Nursing Staff and immunising
those nurses who proved to be susceptible to diphtheria. Since that date 8 cases of diphtheria have
occurred, 1 in 1927, 1 in 1928, 1 in 1929, 2 in 1930, 1 in 1932 and 2 in 1934. It is becoming clearer
that immunisation is not infallible in preventing diphtheria, and the position may be expressed in
the following terms. Immunisation against diphtheria is a 100 per cent. security against a fatality
and a 95 per cent. security against an attack of the disease.
The following table demonstrates the benefits derived from this method of preventive medicine :

Table No. 62.

(1) Number of cases of diphtheria occurring amongst probationer nurses during the first eight months of 1926 (before immunisation was carried out.).9
(2) Incidence rate per annum (taking 30 as average number of probationer nurses).45%
(3) Number of cases of diphtheria occurring amongst probationer nurses from 1927 to 1934 (after immunisation was carried out)8
(4) Incidence rate per annum (taking 30 as average number of probationer nurses).3.3%
(5) Number of nurses Schick Tested (1927 to 1934 inclusive)212
(6) Number of nurses giving a positive reaction105
(7) Percentage of nurses giving a positive reaction49.5
(8) Number of nurses re-Schick Tested54
(9) Number of nurses re-Schick Tested giving a positive reaction17
(10) Percentage of nurses re-Schick Tested giving a positive reaction31.4