London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Willesden 1920

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Willesden]

This page requires JavaScript

Table No. 11. Shewing the Slaughter-houses in Willesden.

1914.January, 1920.December, 1920.
Registered444
Licensed555
Total999

(c) Other Foods.—The following items should receive special attention:—Unsound food and
food inspection; sanitary condition of bakehouses and premises where foods are manufactured, prepared,
stored, or exposed for sale, indicating any important respects in which existing powers have been found
inadequate for dealing with insanitary conditions in such places.
The year 1920, like 1919, has been again remarkable on account of the large quantities of
damaged and unsound foodstuffs voluntarily surrendered by shop-keepers, particulars of which are
given in this report under the heading, "Sanitary Inspection of District."
(d) A reference should be made to any cases of food poisoning in the district.
No case of food poisoning occurred in Willesden in 1920.
(e) Sale of Food and Drugs Acts.— A report on the work done by the local authority tinder these
Acts should be included, with observations on special questions which have received or require attention.
The administration of these Acts is in the hands of the Middlesex County Council, and the
following information relating to the work done in Willesden, has been kindly supplied me by Mr.
Robinson, Chief Officer, Public Control Department.

Table No. 12.

Samples taken during the year ended 31st December, 1920:—

Article.Formal.Informal.
Taken.Adulterated.Taken.Adulterated.
Milk2362426022
Separated Milk121
Butter28
Margarine1
Preserved Cream31
Self-raising Flour41
Ale1
Carbonate of Soda_1
Lime Juice1
Baking Powder2
Cream of Tartar2
Egg Powder1
Custard Powder8
Coffee2
Lard1
Dripping3
Cream2121
Egg Substitute Powder6
Fish Paste13
Lard Compound1
Pepper3
Sugar1
Whiskey1
Total2542533424

One milk-seller was prosecuted for refusing to sell milk to an Inspector, and was fined £10
and Five guineas costs. Another milk-seller was prosecuted for obstructing an Inspector, and was
fined £10 and 10s. costs.
Public Health Milk and Cream Regulations, 1912-1917.—Milk: No preservative was found
in any of the samples of milk analysed. Cream: In one case, preserved cream was sold without
being so labelled, and the vendor was cautioned.