View report page

Statistics and Social Conditions
of the Area
Area (in acres) 3,764
Registrar-General's Estimate of Resident Civilian
Population, 1951 72,840
Number of Inhabited Houses (end of 1951) according
to Rate Books 21,555
Rateable Value (1951) £934.108
Sum represented by a penny rate (1951) £3,810
There is little new to report in regard to the social conditions
of the Borough. The problems of maintaining the environmental
background to what is substantially, indeed almost entirely a
dormitory suburb, continue. These problems tend to become
intensified year by year, as the district grows older. This is particularly
the case, since rebuilding and replanning are not at
present possible on an extensive or even an appreciable scale.
This problem is not peculiar to Southgate, although it
obviously applies more to this type of district than to many others.
We are at present reaping the benefit of past wisdom. If future
generations are to continue to gain the same benefits, vigilance
must in many ways be intensified. It is not always certain that
this important fact is fully appreciated by all burgesses, although
I am personally convinced that the vast mapority of our residents
do appreciate the amenities provided, make good use of them, and
are anxious to do what is possible to safeguard their heritage.
Careful planning in the past has made Southgate a very pleasant
place in which to live and work. The active co-operation of all
who enjoy this privilege is required, if that benefit is to continue.
The type of district which Southgate undoubtedly represents
a potent factor in maintaining the health and well-being of its
inhabitants. Indeed, having regard to the fact that so many of
our burgesses have to travel to the centre of London every day
under trying conditions, and have to work under conditions which
cannot be described as so satisfactory as those in which they live,
the effect of their home environment is probably greater than
many imagine. For that reason alone, it is supremely important
that the character of Southgate should not be allowed to alter.
This is a matter which I have mentioned several times in my
Annual Report. I feel it is of sufficient importance to warrant
repetition.
7