Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Southgate]
This page requires JavaScript
vious years, with certain extensions necessitated by virtue of the
passing of the Milk (Special Designations) Order, 1936. A summary
of the work carried out during 1937 appears below, and from
the figures there set out, it will be seen that the position is relatively
satisfactory. When, however, it is realised that two samples of
raw milk prior to pasteurisation revealed the presence of the
bacillus tuberculosis, it will be seen, first, that the investigations
are very well worth while, and second, that pasteurisation of milk
supplies is at present, a very definite necessity.
Summary of Work carried out during 1937.
Total number of samples examined 204
Samples examined for total bacterial count 152
Samples submitted to reductase test 52
Samples examined for presence of bacillus coli 130
Samples examined for presence of tubercle bacilli 106
Samples of Non -designated Milks, including Raw Milk,
Pasteurised (Non-designated) Milk, Sterilized Milk
and Irradiated Milk, examined 104
Percentage of satisfactory results, as regards total bacterial
count 98.1%
Percentage of satisfactory results, as regards b. coli content 94.2%
Average bacterial count 31,863
Samples of Designated Milks examined 100
Tuberculin Tested (Certified) 24
Tuberculin Tested 16
Tuberculin Tested (Pasteurised) 8
Accredited 12
Pasteurised 40
Fifty-two samples of raw, designated milks were
submitted to the methylene blue (reductase) test with the
following results:— Percentage
found
satisfactory.
Tuberculin Tested (Certified) 100%
Tuberculin Tested 93.2%
Accredited 91.6%
24