Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Croydon]
This page requires JavaScript
Continued from previous page...
| Article | Nature of Adulteration or Deficiency | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Pork | This article earried an unsatisfactory description, as the sample contained pork with ham trimmings and flavourings. | The packers have now amended the label to "Picnic Pork". |
| Bread and Butter | Consisted of Bread and Margarine. | Vendor Prosecuted. |
| Buttered Roll (2 samples) | Consisted of Bread Roll and Margarine. | Vendors Prosecuted. |
| Blue Berry Pie Pilling | The ingredients of this article were not specified on the label in accordance with the Labelling of Pood Order 1953. | The label on this article has now been amended by the Packers. |
| Tinned Scotch Broth Soup | Did not contain significant proportion of meat in soup, should contain 6% meat including bone and fat or 3% boned meat. | Meat deficiency due to fault in canning. Pour cans were found to contain more than 3% boned meat. |
| Soft Herring Roes | This sample of herring roes contained in a tin which had been leaking round the top seam where the lid is super-imposed. | All stocks were withdrawn and destroyed. |
| OFFENCE | RESULT |
|---|---|
| Two Christmas Puddings unfit for human consumption. | Pined £20 in each case. |
| Two loaves of bread, one containing a nail and one containing plaster. | Pined £20 in each case. |
| Two loaves of bread containing grease. | Fined £40 and £50 respectively. |
| Selling roll with margarine instead of buttered roll (2 cases) | First case had a conditional discharge for one year, the other case a fine of £5 was imposed. |
| Chocolate covered roll unfit for human consumption. | Fined £25. |
| Unsound Gingerbread cake. | Fined £20. |
| Mould in sausage roll. | Fined £15. |
| Two cases of smoking whilst handling open food. | Fined £5 and £3 respectively. |