London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Croydon 1924

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Croydon]

This page requires JavaScript

20
porridge, except in a very few instances, where raw milk was taken instead
of tea. As a precautionary measure, both schools were advised to use no
unboiled milk until the position had become clearer. Inspection of the school
registers showed that in school A cases of tonsilitis had occurred since May
25th, and in school B since May 22nd; by this stage of enquiry (June 9th),
17 boys at school A and 24 girls at school B were known to have had
tonsilitis. Some of these were not boarders, and as day-pupils would not
receive milk at school. These might have been infected by personal contact;
or it was conceivable that dairy X supplied milk to their homes. Some lived
outside Croydon, but enquiry at the houses of a number of those living
within Croydon showed that they also received their milk from dairy X,
and drank it without previous boiling.
Simultaneous enquiry of practitioners practising in the district showed
that a considerable number of puzzling cases of tonsilitis had been observed
with or without peculiar rashes in South Croydon and particularly in the
adjoining areas of Sanderstead and Purley. Many of those with anomalous
rashes were regarded as cases of rose measles, while others were thought
to be influenza, which was considered to be very prevalent in the district.
Enquiry showed that in a number of these—in all, in fact, which it was
possible under the circumstances to investigate—the milk came from the
same source, viz., dairy X. Both children and adults were affected, though
the majority of the cases appeared to have been children; it is impossible
to give any exact data on this point, or on the total number of cases
involved. The number of cases of tonsilitis must have amounted in all to
some hundreds. One practitioner, for example, had had "about seventy
cases," another "about forty." The cases appear to have been noticed first
about the middle of May, or possibly somewhat earlier. There had been
no material increase in the number of cases of scarlet fever notified, beyond
that consonant with the ordinary weekly variations frequently encountered
in this disease; while, owing to the difficulty frequently experienced in ascertaining
which particular branch dairy of the larger firms, with names common
to all branches, actually supplies a given household, no suspicion had arisen at this stage of any particular milk supply.

The number of cases occurring week by week over a period of four months are set out below, grouped according to the milk supply:—

Cases of scarlet fever in Croydon with onset* during week ending—Milk Supply from—Total cases of Scarlet Fever.
Dairy X.Other Dairies.
April 5th44
April 12th22
April 19th55
April 26th22
May 3rd33
May 10th44
May 17th77
May 24th235
May 31st5712
June 7th7916
As from June 11th, all dairy X milk was pasteurised and other measures taken.
June 14th33
June 21st66
June 28th66
July 5th11
July 12th55
July 19th22
July 26th55
August 2nd66
*The date of notification in most of these cases would be from one day to several days later than the date of onset