London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Marylebone 1929

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for St. Marylebone, Metropolitan Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Adulterated Samples, etc.

Serial NumberArticleWhether Formal, Informal, or PrivateNature of Adulteration or IrregularityObservations
352MilkInformal10.0 per cent- deficient in milk fat.
390MilkInformal13-3 per cent, deficient in milk fat.
651MilkFormal33.3 per cent.deficient in milk fat and contained 44.85 per cent, of added water.Fined £2 0s. and £3 3s. costs-
701HoneyFormalWas a mixture of honey and invert sugar.Vendor cautioned.
702SugarInformalContained 2.1 grains of tin per lb.
743ButterFormalThe mixed fats contained 51.3 per cent, of margarine fats.Fined 10s. and £1 11 6d. costs,
766MilkInformal6.7 per cent, deficient in milk fat.
825Demerara SugarFormalContained 1.0 grains of tin per lb.Information communicated to the Ministry of Health.
893Demerara SugarInformalContained 1.1 grains of tin per lb.
895Demerara SugarInformalContained 0.7 grains of tin per lb.
901Demerara SugarInformalContained 0.9 grains of tin per lb.
908Demerara SugarInformalContained 1.1 graii.s of tin per lb.
939Demerara SugarInformalContained 0.8 grains of tin per lb.
945Demerara SugarInformalContained 0.8 grains of tin per lb.
952Demerara SugarInformalContained 1.1 grains of tin per lb.

The sum paid in respect ol each analysis was 12s. 6d. per sample.
The Public Analyst (Mr. J. F. F. Rowland) comments, as follows, with regard
to various of the articles examined :—
Milk.—292 samples were examined during the year. Of these 4 were
adulterated, which is 1.37 per cent. The figure for 1928 was only 0.625 per cent.
Apart from the adulterated samples the average composition of the other
milks was as follows :—
Year. Sp: Gr: Total Solids. Fat. Solids not Fat.
1928 1031.3 12.29 8.60 8.69
1929 1031.4 12.34 3.62 8.72
The composition is but slightly different from that of the previous two years,
but what little change there is, is to the good, as the figures for both fat and total
solids have gone up.
Creams.—For the past three years the figures for loose and tinned creams
have been given and compared. So far this comparison has revealed a steady
lowering of the fat content of both kinds of cream. This year, however, the
figures indicate a better average quality, the actual results obtained being-:—
Loose Creams.
Year. Fat.
1926 54.7
1927 51.4
1928 42.33
1929 47.39
Tinned Creams
Year. Fat.
1926 28.87
1927 25.6
1928 28.73
1929 29.92