Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for St. Marylebone, Metropolitan Borough]
This page requires JavaScript
The following Tables and Report from the Public Analyst give full information with regard to samples submitted to and examined by him:
Articles submitted for Analysis. | State whether the sample was submitted to the Analyst by an Officer acting under direction of a Local Authority, under Section 13 of Act, and, if so, the name of such Authority. | Result of Analysis; showing whether the sample was Genuine or Adulterated, and if Adulterated what were the nature and extent of the Adulteration. | The sum paid in respect of the Analysis. | Observations. |
---|---|---|---|---|
FIRST QUARTER ENDING 31ST MARCH, 1919. | ||||
Food Inspector, St. Marylebone Borough Council | £500 per ann. for 700 samples. Over that number 7/6 per sample | |||
97 milk | Do. | Genuine. | No sample contained preservative. | |
2 milk | Do. | Adulterated. | Fined £6and £1/1/-costs. | |
No. 96. 23.0 per cent. deficient in fat | ||||
No. 152. 13.0 do. do. | Fined £2 and £2/2/-costs. | |||
37 butter | Do. | Genuine. | 23 were test samples | |
10 samples contained less than 10 grains of boracic acid per lb. | ||||
25 samples contained between 10-20 grains of boracic acid per lb. | ||||
Two samples contained between 20-30 grains of boracic acid per lb. | ||||
24 margarine | Do. | Genuine. | 12 were test samples | |
11 coffee | Do. | Do. | 10 were test samples | |
5 mustard | Do. | Do. | Four were test samples. | |
2 vinegar | Do. | Do. | Two were test samples | |
2 ginger | Do. | Do. | ||
5 cocoa | Do. | Do. | Five were test samples. | |
1 borax | Do. | Do. | This was a test sample. | |
1 dried egg | Do. | Do. | Do. | |
1 pepper | Do. | Do. | Do. | |
1 whisky | Do. | Do. | Do. | |
Total Number of Samples analysed during the Quarter | 189 | |||
Number of Samples adulterated | 2 | |||
SECOND QUARTER ENDING 30TH JUNE, 1919. | ||||
97 milk | Food Inspector, St. Marylebone Borough Council | Genuine | No preservative in any sample. | |
Three were test samples | ||||
9 milk | Do. | Adulterated. | ||
No. 226. 13.3 per cent. deficient in milk fat | No. 226. Vendor cautioned. | |||
No. 270. 33.3 do. do. | No. 270. Fined £2 and £1/6/- costs. | |||
No. 274. 6.7 do. do. | No. 274. Fined £2 and £1/5/6 costs. | |||
No. 307. 13.0 do. do. | No. 307. Fined £2 and £2/6/- costs. | |||
No. 310. 13.0 do. do. | Mo. 310. Fined £2 and £2/6/- costs. | |||
No. 333. 6.7 do. do. (and 11.8 per cent. added water.) | No. 333. Fined £2 and £2/2/- costs. | |||
No. 334. 16.7 per cent. deficient in milk fat | No. 334. Fined £25 and £3/3/- costs. | |||
No. 337. 6.67 do do. | No. rf37. Fined £2 and £3/3/- costs. |