Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London, City of ]
This page requires JavaScript
31
(c) Instances where (apart from analysis) the requirements as to labelling or declaration
of preserved cream in Article V. (1) and the proviso in Article V. (2) of the regulations have
not been observed.
Nil.
(d) Particulars of each case in which the regulations have not been complied with, and
action taken.
Nil.
Thickening Substances.—Any evidence of their addition to cream or preserved cream.
Action taken where found.
Nil.
Other observations, if any.
Nil.
THE PUBLIC HEALTH (CONDENSED MILK) REGULATIONS. 1923. Thirty-three samples of different brands of condensed milk were taken and submitted to the Public Analyst, as follows:—
| Condensed Full Cream Milk Sweetened | 8 |
| Condensed Skimmed or Machine Skimmed Milk Sweetened | 22 |
| Condensed Skimmed Milk Unsweetened | 3 |
| Condensed Full Cream Milk Unsweetened | .... |
| Total | 33 |
In no instance was the condensed milk found to be below the required standard or the
equivalent contents below that stated on each label. In three instances the labels were
not in conformity with the Regulations, the Minister of Health being informed of two of
these, and in the third case the importer immediately took steps to remedy the defect when
his attention was called to the matter.