London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1912

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

191
Report of the County Medical Officer—Education.
The correlation co-efficient between the size of the fraternity and the order of birth is for the
defectives, r = .81 ± .06, and for the normals, r = .65 ± .008.

The detailed distribution of the size ot the fraternity including detective children is shown in the following table:—

Order of birth.Size of fraternity.Total.
1234567891011121314151617181920
13822453935187633111-------219
2322419321975121---------142
3381727251172221--------132
4352227225111---------114
52017261666111-94
6301620711111------78
724117512111-----53
8299722111-----52
9121610221------43
101371211-----25
11922-------13
12421-----7
1353111-11
14221-11-7
1521-1-4
162-1-3
17--11
18----
191-1
2011
3854107110136136113994856361618109612321,000

Defective
children.

The next table shews the detailed distribution as regards scholarship children.

Order of birth.Size of fraternity.Total
123456789101112131415161718
164807349302318544--------350
249514420237112---------207
34040351312122211------158
42821131081111--84
5282291171280
6131963321-----47
719541130
883112------15
974211-----15
!i05121-9
1121------3
12--------
13-------
1422
64129164161134107946633228105211,000

Scholarship
children.
These tables are at their extremes open to the possible fallacies: (1) that the smaller families may
not be complete, actually over 80 per cent, of those with only one or two members were complete,
owing to the death or age of the parents; (2) that in the smaller families there would be a greater chance
of the older members having attained the age at which the examination, whether for scholarships or
mental deficiency, coilld be conducted, and that other members may subsequently qualify; this,
however, appears contradicted in the defective children, but may be asserted for the groups of efficient
families in which there are only two or three members; (3) that in the larger families the younger members
would be more likely to be of the required ages, and that earlier members may also have been specially
efficient or deficient; this criticism cannot be negatived from the data available for families with more
than ten members.
Relative fertility of efficient and deficient stocks.—Great importance attaches to the relative fertility
of efficient and deficient stocks. It is often asserted that the fertility rate of the deficient is so great
that in a short time they will outnumber the sound stocks. Others think that a selective death rate
operating more strongly against the defective stock will quite counterbalance this fertility. Some data
bearing on the question can be obtained from the medical records of the special and secondary schools.
The numbers of children born and the number who had died at the date of the record have been taken