London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1906

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Sanitary area.Population.Crude Death-rateCorrected Death-rate
(a) Annual Summary estimate.(b) Equalisation of Rates' estimate.Calculated on (a).Calculated on (b).Calculated on (a).Calculated on (b).
Bermondsey128,629128,95119.719.620.220.1
Lambeth31.5,774307,76415.015.415.515.9
Battersea ..179,622172,32913.413.914.414.9
Wandsworth273,381296,02012.811.813.512.4
Camberwell274,132266,24514.615.015.115.6
Deptford115,495113,05116.116.416.917.2
Greenwich105,350101,92213.513.913.814.2
Lewisham ...148,463158,38112.011.212.511.7
Woolwich ...127,345134,82513.112.414.013.3
London ......4,721,2174,668,31515.115.215.916.0

Reference to this table shows that in the case of nine districts, viz., Fulham, Chelsea, Finsbury,
City, Stepney, Southwark, Wandsworth, Lewisham, and Woolwich, the difference in the death-rates
obtained is more than 0'5 per 1,000 living. In five of these districts, viz., Finsbury, City, Wandsworth,
Lewisham and Woolwich the adoption of the " equalisation" populations gives a lower
death-rate, while in the four remaining districts the death-rate is increased.
The following table shows the number of deaths1 (All Causes) occurring at several ages in
each of the sanitary areas of the Administrative County of London during the year 1906 (365 days) —

All Causes—Deaths at the several age-periods in sanitary areas—1906 (365days).

Age period.0-1-2-3-4-Under 5.5-10-15-20-25-35-45-55-65-75-85 & upwardsAll Ages.
Paddington35579231994853623264095166218251251206771,874
Kensington458136512728700371539401442112503133602941082,511
Hammersmith428914130256155026203693148152208237151501,786
Fulham66014861402593449262656112159217204235159472,224
Chelsea212713014733414139166989134132186138361,170
Westminster, City of3329035241549634163142126228282337356242702,260
St. Marylebone3248336221548035193841105188209258285218661,942
Hampstead1163071110174174112130618211815113341843
St. Pancras7612178966401,173895267822183504274294653281013,781
Islington1,10031815972421,6919444621142753885296096705041365,116
Stoke Newington11419124415315591134487375907334620
Hackney687179773024997673861801722162883324273161073,101
Holborn14852138923013813135212612113815910125999
Finsbury47420876562984333335223109154182228197141342,029
London, City of371265607810926365052554318374
Shoreditch6512108040321,01353242940116205242218"191130352,296
Bethnal-green7032376439301,07358383253146183240229214184522,502
Stepney1,46554119587712.3591266188111307438502573551303745,493
Poplar8202579056351,25868464564133226258313352215403,018
Southwark91029611267391,424S3426969206384412381419263503,802
Bermondsey6302457066431,05464323954142209248243256175432,559
Lambeth1,0982799952531,5811046882802623394355816504401424,704
Battersea59017854273488362394369144173221265267170592,395
Wands worth8831546943391,188654654672012653214044503281293,518
Camberwell91727611675351,41910347811032362433734544473891424,037
Deptford4791456739247544519303976134153180218168591,875
Greenwich32469412019473491629348395135145189141491,438
Lewisham396923124135564413313798126164214244195751,797
Woolwich3917630182053550253437114141179191217128381,689
London16,4634,7881,8341,08176924,9351,5648461,1601,4813,9245,7297,0978,0758,7896,2761,93771,813

London mortality in 1906 compared with the mortality in the decennium 1891-1900.
The following table shows the mean death-rates obtaining in London at the several age-periods
and for each sex in the decennium 1891-1900 and in the year 1906. The figures for the year 1906 are fully
corrected for institution deaths (see footnote (2), page 7), and the rates for the decennium 1891-1900
are based upon figures which have been corrected for institution deaths on the basis of the experience
of the four years 1897-1900; a fuller discussion of this point will be found in the London Life Table
appended to my report for the year 1901.
1 See footnote (2), page 7.