Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]
This page requires JavaScript
5
Beds inspected—No samples sent to the Chemist for analysis.
Nature of probable pollution in each instance.
Not in cultivation. Liable to flooding from a river which flows through grazing lands
Proximity to a farmyard, and flooding from a river to which sewage effluent has access
Situated below a village, surface washings from which during heavy rainfall reach the stream. Possibility of overflow
from the cesspools in the neighbourhood on to the surface of the ground near the stream
Proximity to dwellings
*Deposits of manure and decaying vegetable matter ; the beds, moreover, are in proximity to town dwellings | ||
*Situated in a locality which is being rapidly built over. Adjoins a sewage farm. Effluent from other sewage farms has access to the river several miles up stream. There are several leather mills and much market garden land on the river. The river receives the surface washings of a large area | ||
*By-stream supplying the beds is partly fed by sewage effluent | ||
*Surface drainage of farmyard and cesspool overflow | ||
*Surface drainage of agricultural land and cesspool overflow | ||
*Stream coming from land used as sewage farm | ||
o) | ||
*he only water used is the effluent water from a sewage farm | ||
*roximity to piggeries and surface drainage | ||
*ater from a ditch which comes from a dairy farm; washings, urine, etc., from a cowshed | ||
*Effluent from large sewage works enters the stream | ||
† The figures indicate samples of water (Table 1.) sent to Dr. Houston for bacteriological examination.
According to Dr. Houston's classilication, samples V". and IX. were waters of the 5th class; sample I. was a water of the
3rd class; samples II., IV., and X. were waters of the 7th class ; and samples III. and XI. were waleis of the 8th class