London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

London County Council 1902

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council]

This page requires JavaScript

The columns showing "death-rates corrected for age and sex distribution" have been obtained by multiplying the crude death-rates by the " factor for correction,''* published by the Begistrar-General in the Annual Summary for 1902—

Towns.Estimated population middle of 1902.Crude death-rate per 1,000 living.Death-rate per 1,000 living (corrected for age and sex distribution).
1892-1901.1902.1892-1901.1902.
London4579,11019. 2117.7120.218.6
Manchester.549,17023.520.026.322.3
Liverpool692,49524.122.525.824.1
Birmingham528,18120.718.622.320.0
Leeds437,03719.917.621.719.2
Sheffield418,17720.417.122.018.4
Bristol334,63217.817.418.317.9
Nottingham243,19118.716.719.717.6
Bradford281,77118.415.820.317.5
Hull245.44919.417.219.917.6
Salford224,00723.719.326.221.3
West Ham275,40818.617.119.918.3
Leicester216,38917.714.918.915.9
Newcastle219,15021.119.922.821.5

London had, therefore (comparing the corrected death-rates), in 1902 a lower death-rate
than Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Leeds, Salford, and Newcastle, and in the decennium
1892-1901 had a lower death-rate than any of these towns except Bristol, Nottingham, Hull,
West Ham, and Leicester.
The following table enables comparison to be made of the death-rates of London with
the death-rates of several foreign cities2—

All causes—Deatli-rate? per 1,000 living.

Towns.1892-1901.1902.Town..1892-1901.1902.
London19.2117.71St. Petersburg27.823.0
Paris ...20.218.4Berlin18.716.1
Brussels18.016.1Vienna21.719.4
Amsterdam17.115.4Rome19.421.9
Copenhagen18.515.4New York20.718.7
Stockholm17.814.3

It will be seen that both in the period 1892-1901 and in 1902 the London death-rate
exceeded that of any of these towns except Paris, St. Petersburg, Vienna, Home, and New
York.
The following table shows the crude death-rates and the death-rates corrected for
differences in the age and sex constitution of the several metropolitan boroughs during the
year 1902—

Crude and corrected death-rates,s per 1,000 persons living, in the County of London

and the several metropolitan boroughs.

District.Standard death-rate.Factor tor correction for age and sex distribution.Crude death-rate, 1902.Corrected death rate, 1902.Comparative mortality figure, 1902 (London, 1,000).
England and Wales18.19
London17.311.0510717.2‡18.11.000
Paddington17.101.0639814.615.5856
Kensington17.051.0671015.316.3901
Hammersmith17.471.0414416.317.0939
Fulham .17.391.0462317.117.9989
Chelsea17.571.0355218.018.61,028
Westminster, City of15.971.1392616.118.31,011

* These factors are based upon the age and sex constitution of the respective populations at the census of 1901.
1 Including deaths of Londoners in the Metropolitan Workhouses, Hospitals and Lunatic Asylums, outside the County of London,
but excluding deaths of non-Londoners in the Willesden Workhouse, the London Fever Hospital, the Metropolitan Asylums Board's
Hospitals and the Middlesex County Lunatic Asylum, within the County of London.
2 All death-rates in this report relating to foreign cities are calculated upon figures published by the Registrar-General.
* All death-rates in this report relating to Metropolitan Boroughs are fully corrected for institutions; (see footnote (') page 12.