Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for St. Pancras, London, Borough of]
This page requires JavaScript
128
§ 7— DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
Drainage Register.—The following is an analysis of the Drainage Register
during 1909:—
Total number of Amplications and Plans 841
Number of Applications without Plans 333
Number of Plans 508
„
Plans—Old Buildings under Notice 260
Plans—Old Buildings, Voluntary 225
Plans—New Buildings and additions 23
508
After Infectious Disease. | Upon Complaint. | Upon systematic Inspection | Old Buildings. | New Buildings at completion of work. | Total. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At commencement of work. | At completion of work. | ||||||||
By Grenada. | 1. Defects found | 167 | 185 | ... | ... | 23 | ... | 375 | |
2. No result | 767 | 216 | ... | ... | 71 | ... | 1054 | ||
3. Total | 934 | 401 | ... | ... | 94 | ... | 1429 | ||
By Exposure by the Department. | 1. Defects found | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
2. No result | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ||
3. Total | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ||
By Smoke. | 1. Defects localised | ... | 2 | ... | ... | 4 | ... | 6 | |
2. No result | ... | 3 | ... | ... | 8 | ... | 11 | ||
3. Total | ... | 5 | ... | ... | 12 | ... | 17 | ||
By Water. | 1. Not found water-tight | ... | ... | ... | ... | 111 | 24 | 135 | |
2. Found water-tight | ... | ... | ... | ... | 1170 | 167 | 1337 | ||
3. Total | ... | ... | ... | ... | 1281 | 191 | 1372 | ||
Sum Total | 167 | 187 | ... | ... | 138 | 24 | 516 | Sum Total | |
767 | 219 | ... | ... | 1249 | 167 | 2402 | |||
934 | 406 | ... | ... | 1387 | 191 | 2918 |
Combined Drainage.—The Metropolitan Sewers and Drains Bill was introduced
in the House of Commons on the 5th March, 1908, by Mr. W. H. Dickinson, M.P.,
with a view of amending the law relating to combined drainage in London,
which for many years past has been in a most unsatisfactory state. The Bill
was down for second reading on several occasions, but no progress was made
during the session. It was re-introduced on the 30lh March, 1909, but again
it failed to secure a second reading.