London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Poplar 1936

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Poplar, Metropolitan Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Food and Drugs (Adulteration) Act, 1928.

Article.Result of Analysis, etc.Result.Inspector.
Mercury OintmentDeficient in mercury 65%Dismissed under the Probation of Offenders Act; £3 3s. costsGrabham, C. A.
Liniment of TurpentineDeficient in camphor 40% and in soft soap 30%Dismissed under the Probation of Offenders Act; £2 2s. costsdo.
MilkDeficient in fat 73%Dismissed under the Probation of Offenders Act; £2 2s. costsdo.
Minced MeatContained sulphur dioxide 65 parts per million£5 penalty; £2 costsdo.
MilkDeficient in fat 40%£50 penalty; £10 10s. costsPearce, H. A.
MilkDeficient in non-fatty solids 0.2%Summons not served and not proceeded with
(Same defendant as in preceding case. Magistrate stated ho was doubtful if he had power to strike defendant off the register, and refused to do so .)
CornflourContained foreign starch 50%Dismissed under the Probation of Offenders Act; £2 4s. costsGrabham, C. A.
Minced BeefContained sulphur dioxide 140 parts per million£2 penalty; £2 2s. costsdo.

Note.—Letters were sent to 3 vendors in respect of other unsatisfactory samples.

Public Health (Meat) Regulations, 1924.

Defendant.Offence.Result.Inspector.
— C., of 115, Canfield Road, Woodford Bridge, EssexWhile engaged in the transport of meat did not take precautions to prevent exposure of meat to contamination£2 penaltyPearce, H. A.
H. B., of 290, Devons Road, E.3While engaged in the handling and transport of meat did not take reasonable precautions to prevent exposure of meat to contamination£1 penaltydo.
S. J., of 75, Aberfeldy Street, E. 14While engaged in the handling and transport of meat did not take reasonable precautions to prevent exposure of meat to contamination£1 penaltydo.
E. J. S., of 39, Parkers Row, BermondseyWhile engaged in the handling and transport of meat did not take reasonable precautions to prevent exposure of meat to contamination£1 penaltydo.
J. W., of 59, Carson Road, E. 13While engaged in the handling and transport of meat did not take reasonable precautions to prevent exposure of meat to contamination£1 penaltydo.