View report page

76
summary of legal proceedings
NOTES.
(1) Defendant fined £3 with 12/6 costs on 17th January, 1897, for selling milk containing 5% of
added water.
„ £2 12/6 ,, 3rd June, 1897, for selling milk containing 7% of
added water.
„ £1 12/6 „ 3rd June, 1897, for selling milk containing 6% of
added water.
„ £10 25/- „ 5th December, 1902, for selling milk 10% deficient in fat.
Defendant fined £40 with £10 10s. costs on 9th June, 1905, for selling milk 12% deficient in fat.
Summonses heard on 25th April, 1902, and 11th March, 1904, were dismissed, the defendant
proving a warranty in each case.
(2) A summons heard on the 27th October, 1906, was dismissed, but the defendants' servant was
ordered to pay 1d. for damage done to milk and 40s. for wilfully damaging same,
or in default one month.
(3) Defendant fined £2 with 12/6 costs, on 18th December, 1903, for selling milk 10% deficient in
fat.
(4) „ £2 2/- „ 29th May, 1904, for selling milk containing 17% of added
water.
„ £3 12/6 „ 16th February, 1899, for selling milk containing 17% of
added water.
„ £3 12/6 „ 8th March, 1901, for selling milk containing 12% of
added water.
„ £3 23/- „ 1st August, 1902, for refusing to supply sample.
„ £10 12/6 „ 23rd January, 1903, for selling milk containing 12% of
added water.
„ £10 12/6 „ 7th August, 1903, for selling milk containing 7% of
added water.
Summonses heard on 1st January and 5th February, 1904, were dismissed, the defendant proving a warranty in
in each case.
(5) „ £2 12/6 „ 12th December, 1902, for selling milk containing 10% of
added water.
(6) „ £1 12/6 „ 17th January, 1902, for selling butter containing 80% of
foreign fat.