| (9) 2.6.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations i960. Rett. 9(e), 33, 34 Using tobacco whilst in a food room, where there was open food displayed at 422 Essex Road. | Fined 15. Defendant to pay £3 costs. |
| (10) 2.6.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations 1960. Regs. 5. 33, 34 Carrying on a food business in insanitary premises thus exposing food to the risk of contamination at 422 Essex Road. | Fined £15. Defendant to pay £5 costs. |
| (11) 2.6.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations i960. Regs. 5, 33, 34 Carrying on a food business in insanitary premises thus exposing food to the risk of contamination at 1A Camden Walk. | Fined £10. Defendant to pay £5 costs. |
| (12) 2.6.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations 1960 Regs. 5, 33, 34 Carrying on a food business in insanitary premises thus exposing food to the risk of contamination at 1A Camden Walk. | Summons not served -Magistrates' Courts Act. |
| (13) 7.7.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations 1960 Regs. 5, 33. 34 Carrying on a food business in inaanitary premises thus exposing the food to risk of contamination at 57 3 Holloway Road | Fined £20. Defendant to pay £3 coats. |
| (14) 7.7.64 | Food Hygiene (General) Regulations 1960 Regs. 5, 33, 34 Carrying on a food business in insanitary premises thus exposing the food to risk of contamination at 1A Camden Walk. | Fined £10. Defendant to pay £5 costs. |
| (15) 7.7.64 | Sections 8 & 10 Gave away in the furtherance of trade food namely a sausage roll, intended for, but unfit for human consumption at 589 Holloway Road. | Fined £20. Defendant to pay £12 10s. Od. costs. Bakery a party also joined in the proceedings by another party were fined £25 and the Council awarded £12 10s.Od. costs. |
| (16) 7.7.64 | Section 2(1) Selling to the prejudice of the purchaser food, namely a chicken and ham pie not of the quality demanded by reason of the presence of mould at 15, Islington Green. | Fined £20. Defendant to pay £5 costs. |
| (17) 21.7.64 | Section 2(1) Selling to the prejudice of the purchaser food, namely a meat bread roll not of the Quality demanded in that it contained hairs at 120 Fonthill Road. | Fined £1, Defendant to pay £3 coats. |
| (18) 21.7.64 | Section 2(1) Selling to the prejudice of the purchaser food, namely a loaf of bread not of the quality demanded in that it contained soiled dough, at 487 Homsey Road. | Fined £25. Defendant to pay £1 costs. |
| (19) 21.7.64 | Sections 2(1), 113(3) Selling to the prejudice of the purchaser food, namely a loaf of bread not of the quality demanded in that it contained a nail at 59 Junction Road. | Fined £25. Defendant to pay £5 costs. |
