London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Islington 1950

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Islington Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

Continued from previous page...

Date of heari ngOffenceResult of ProceedingsCourt
3. Failure to keep clean the windows of the said rooms.Defendant fined £3.
4. Failure to keep clean the floors of the said rooms.Defendant fined £3.
5. Failure to keep in a proper state or repair the floors of the said rooms.Defendant fined £3.
6. Failure to take steps as were reasonably necessary to prevent risk of contamination of food in the said rooms.Mot separately dealt with.
21.4.501. Selling College Pudding intended for but unfit for human consumption contrary to Section 9 of the Act.Defendant lined £20. Council awarded £ 10 10s. costs.North London
2. Selling College Pudding not of the quality demanded contrary to Section 3 of the Act.Action under Section 3 withdrawn.
1.6.50Selling Tinned Fish not of the nature demanded.Defendant fined £20. Councilawarded £10 10s. costs.North London
16.6.50Having in possession for the purpose of sale horseflesh for human consumption.Defendant fined £10. Council awarded £5 costs.North London
12.7.50Selling a Bun Round intended for but unfit for human consumption, and not of the nature, substance and quality demanded.Defendant fined £2. Council awarded £2 2s. costs.North London
17.7.50Selling Chocolate Cake not of the quality demanded.Defendant fined £3. Council awarded £i 2s. costs.North London
26.0.50Selling Meat not of the nature demanded.Defendant fined £10. Council awarded £5 5s. costs.North London
26.9.50Possessing horseflesh for sale without exhibiting the necessary notice.Defendant fined £2.North London
26.9.50Selling Meat not of the nature demanded.Defendant fined £10. Council awarded £5 5s. costs.North London
27.9.50Selling Bread not of the nature demanded. (Rope in bread).Discharged under Criminal Justice Act. Council awarded £4 4s. costs.North London
20.0.50Selling Fruit Cake not of the quality demanded.Discharged under Criminal Justice Act. Council awarded £2 15s. fid. costs.North London
3.10.50Selling Brown Bread not of the quality demanded.Defendant fined £3. Council awarded £2 14s. costs.North London
5.10.50Possessing for the purpose of preparation for sale Chocolate and Fudge intended for, but unfit for human consumption.Case dismissed.North London
18.10.50Selling Bread not of the substance demanded.Discharged under Criminal Justice Act. Councilawarded £2 7s. costs.North London
23.11.50Selling Bread intended for but nnfit for human consumption.Defendant fined £10. Council awarded £5 5s. costs.North London
23.11.50Selling Bread not of the quality demanded.Not separately dealt with.North London
23.11.50Selling Bread not of the quality demantled.Not separately dealt with.North London
23.11.50Selling Bread intended for, but unfit for human consumption.Defendant fined £5. Council awarded £5 5s. costs.North London
5.12.50Storing ice-cream without registering premises.Defendant fined £2. Council awarded £2 costs.North London
Food and Drugs Act, 1038. Milk and Dairies Regulations, 1949.
26.4.50Failure to cause a vessel containing milk to be kept in a state of thorough cleanliness.Case dismissed. Costs against Council £\ Is.North London
13.11.50Failure to keep clean vessel used for containing milk.Defendant fined £3. Council awarded £1 Is. costs.North London
11.11.50Failure to keep clean vessel used for containing milk.Case dismissedOld Street
Merchandise Marks Act, 1887.
2.6.50Exposing for sale Tinned Fish to which a certain false trade description was then applied contrary to Section 2 of lite Merchandise Marks Act. 1887.Defendant fined £20. Council awarded £10 10s. costs.North London