London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Kensington 1949

[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for Kensington Borough]

This page requires JavaScript

- 17 -
programme for the clearance of unhealthy areas and, in this
connection, the London County Council asked to be furnished
with an approximate estimate of the provisional slum clearance
programme. A survey of various areas in the borough was made
and those areas which might prove suitable for treatment under
the Housing Act, 1936, were divided into two classes, viz.:-
Class I - Areas adequately planned but where
structurally the buildings are worn out and where
demolition is necessary on health grounds, and
which would then provide sites suitable for the
erection of housing accommodation.
Class II - Areas consisting chiefly of mews dwellings
which, owing to sanitary defects inherent in the
original buildings and sanitary or structural defects
due to disrepair, are prejudicial to the health of
the occupants; or where the area is so badly planned
as to cause congestion of the buildings in the area.
At the end of the year consideration was being given to
five areas in Class I and ten areas in Class II. Any schemes
for demolition and clearance of these areas will be governed
by the availability of accommodation for rehousing the persons
to be displaced. As a commencement to a slum clearance
programme, the following two areas were officially represented
as clearance areas under the Housing Act, 1936:-
Elgin Mews - Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28.
Lionel Mews - Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17,
18, 19 and 20.
Overcrowding.

All cases of overcrowding are considered by the special Sub-Committee of the Public Health Committee with a view to deciding what action should be taken. The following are details of the cases dealt with in 1949:-

1. New cases reported to the Sub-Committee during 1949176
(a) Cases in which the Sub-Committee reconmended that alternative accommodation should be offered by the Council98
(b) Cases in which proceedings were ordered to be taken without prior offer of alternative accommodation21
(c) Cases where action was postponed48
(d) Cases withdrawn or where no action was taken9
2. Cases of overcrowding abated during the year147