View report page

23
The sewer was uncovered, in the presence of the Committee,
in four places, three being on the length indicated by Mr.
Martin. One of these three openings was 12 feet long, the
others 6 feet long, and all had cross-sections to facilitate examination
to the full depth of the work. The fourth opening
was made to the south of the lamphole and was 6 feet long.
The Committee and other Vestrymen descended Manhole
No. 1, and inspected the sewer by aid of a light in the lamphole.
The sewer appeared to be of excellent workmanship,
and was in perfect order.
The exterior of the sewer was also seen by examination in
the openings to be without fault, being thoroughly encased in
concrete of excellent quality, samples of which were taken,
and of the requisite thickness everywhere. There was no
leakage, no evidence of flaw, or any imperfection whatever.
Mr. Martin also examined the sewer inside and out, and
expressed himself "perfectly satisfied," adding that he was
surprised to find the work so well done.
The Committee reported to the Vestry that the East Plumstead
Sewer had been well and properly laid, and that Mr.
Martin's allegations to the contrary were disproved.
The names given by Mr. Martin, as being his informants,
were "Leegood" and "Pollard," but on being pressed, Mr.
Martin stated that he was not acquainted with the Christian
names and addresses of these two informants ; he promised,
however, to obtain particulars and endeavour to produce the
two men before the Committee, but this he failed to do, and
the Vestry, on the recommendation of the Committee, passed
the following Resolutions, viz.:—