Table: Details ofAdulteratedSamples ofMilkduring the Year endedDecember31st,1915.
Details ofAdulteratedSamples ofMilkduring the Year ended
December31st,1915.
| Sample Marked. | Result of Analysis. | Observations. |
|---|
| Official Samples. |
| 2 | 8 per cent, added water | Summons withdrawn, not having been served in time by the Police |
| 14 | 5 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Vendor fined £4 and £1 3s. costs |
| 15 | 3 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
| 20 | 6 „ ,, ,, | Vendor fined 10s. and £1 3s. costs |
| 26 | 29 per cent, added water | Summons withdrawn, not having been served in time by the Police, defendant paying £5 5s. costs |
| 27 | 5 ,, ,, ,, | Summons not served, as defendant left the neighbourhood |
| 81 | 4 per cent, deficient in milk fat | No action |
| 38 | 3 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor cautioned by direction of the Public Health Committee |
| 53 | 6 ,, ,, ,, | Summons dismissed on proof of warranty |
| 154 | 5 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Vendor fined 15s. |
| 183 | 6 ,, ,, ,, | Summons dismissed on proof of warranty |
| 192 | 6 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor fined 19s. and £1 Is. costs |
| 214 | 16 „ ,, ,, | ,, ,, ,, |
| 218 | 26 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor fined 15s. |
| 224 | 10 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor fined 3s. 6d. and 21s. costs |
| 226 | 16 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor fined 13s. and£l Is. costs |
| 260 | 20 ,, ,, ,, | Summons dismissed ; vendor's explanation considered |
| 276 | 6 ,, ,, ,, | Vendor fined 3s. 6d. and 21s. costs |
| 119 | 62 per cent. Foreign fat | Vendor fined £2, including costs |
| 306 | 3 per cent, added water | Cautioned by order of Committee |
| 318 | 1.66 per cent deficient inmilk fat | ,, ,, ,, |
| 383 | 8 per cent, deficient in milk fat | Case proved; defendant proved warranty |