Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
Report on the vital and sanitary statistics of the Borough of Lambeth during the year 1905
This page requires JavaScript
170
admixture with other bacilli, whereas in the remaining 71 (i.c.,
63.96 per cent.) the Klebs-Lœffler bacilli were found combined
with other well-known bacilli as follows :—
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + staphylococci 27
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + streptococci 14
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + staphylococci 4- streptococci 5
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + pseudo (Hoffmann) bacilli +
staphylococci 4
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + streptococci + torulœ 1
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + staphylococci + sarcinœ 1
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + sarcinœ. 3
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + streptococci + sarcinœ 3
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + Diplococci 2
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + Vincent's organisms 1
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli pseudo (Hoffmann) bacilli 1
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + pseudo (Hoffmann) bacilli +
staphylococci sarcinœ 4
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli -)- pseudo (Hoffmann) bacilli +
staphylococci + streptococci 2
Klebs-Lœffler bacilli + streptococci + staphylococci +
sarcinœ 3
In 1,533 (i.e, 93'2 per cent.) of the total number of throat and
nose samples examined, the Klebs-Lœffler bacilli were not
isolated, but other bacilli were found as follow :—
Staphylococci 536
Streptococci 63
Staphylococci + streptococci 484
Staphylococci + sarcinœ 16
Staphylococci + torulœ76
Staphylococci + micrococci 9
Staphylococci -+- diplococci 1
Staphylococci -+- smegma 1
Staphylococci + torulœ + sarcinœ 1