Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
Report on the vital and sanitary statistics of the Borough of Lambeth during the year 1904
This page requires JavaScript
II.-CONSUMPTION NOTIFICATIONS, 1902-4. (Arranged in Registration Sub-Districts so as to shew the varying incidences).
Sub-Districts. | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | Total 1902-4 | Incidence Rate per 1000 Population. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waterloo Road 1st | 32 | 23 | 19 | 74 | 5.9 |
Waterloo Road 2nd | 29 | 23 | 31 | 83 | |
Lambeth Church 1st | 39 | 52 | 58 | 149 | 8.1 |
Lambeth Church 2nd | 68 | 101 | 68 | 237 | 5.9 |
Kennington 1st | 44 | 63 | 52 | 159 | 2.9 |
Kennington 2nd | 36 | 30 | 33 | 99 | 2.2 |
Brixton | 55 | 36 | 37 | 128 | 1.4 |
Norwood | 12 | 11 | 8 | 31 | 0.8 |
Borough of Lambeth | 315 | 339 | 306 | 960 | 3.1 |
It will be seen from the voluntary notifications received that
the disease appears to have a greater incidence on the Inner
than on the Outer Districts (whether Registration Sub-Districts
or Wards), in the same way as the death-rate (per 1,000 persons
living) from this disease is also greater. This result was to be
expected, bearing in mind the more crowded conditions (persons
in houses or houses over area) that exist in the Inner as compared
with the Outer Districts—the patients notified being chiefly
of the artisan and working class. It must be remembered, however,
that the notification of consumption is voluntary, and that
only a percentage of the cases are heard of.