London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Kensington 1902

Report of the Medical Officer of Health for the four weeks, August 10th to September 6th, 1902...

This page requires JavaScript

(10) Two children (unvaccinated) who fell ill simultaneously
(no history of infection), infected two other children
in the same house. (Cases 58 and 59, No. 4 Report, page 86,
and cases 62 and 63, No. 5 Report, page 96.)
(11) An anonymous letter led to discovery of six cases in
one house. The first case was that of a boy, the nature of
whose illness there is reason to belie re was known (or suspected
) by his mother, whom, as well as four other persons,
lie infected. (Cases 73 to 78, No. 6 Report, page 106.)
(12) A carman (source of infection unknown) infected
his wife and two children. (Cases 81—84, No. 6 Report, page
107.)
(13) Three days after arrival in the borough, a boy fell
ill; the disease was not recognized. He infected three other
members of the family, from whom four sisters, in another
house, contracted the disease, and in a third house the fiance
of one of them. (Cases 88 to 91, No. 6 Report, page 197, and
cases 93 to 97, No. 7 Report, page 124.)
(14) Two men were infected by their father, whom they
had visited before his removal to hospital: a third son, who
had slept with his father, escaped. (Cases 101—103, No. 8
Report, page 138.)
Amongst individual cases the following are deserving of
mention, some of them as indicating sources of infection outside the
Borough.
Cases 1 and 2 (No. 13 Report, 1901, page 176) imported from
another Borough.
Case 3 (No. 3 Report, page 177). A youth employed in Kensington,
fell ill simultaneously with a fellow employe who resided in another
Borough, whose two brothers, moreover, were stricken at the same
time. The obviously common source of infection was not traced.
Case 4 (No. 14, page 195) was on a visit in another Borough at
the date of infection.
Case 5 (No. 14, page 196) employed in another Borough, as a
bedmaker, at a Rowton House where there were cases of small-pox,
was sent home with the premonitory symptoms of small-pox.
Case 6 (No. 14, page 14) was infected at the Casual Ward in
another Borough, before coming to reside at a Boys' Home in
Kensington.
Case 8 (No. 1 Report, 1902, page 4). A public-house manager,
thought to be suffering from chicken-pox, infected a barmaid who
fell ill of small-pox in another Borough.
Case 10 (No. 1, page 5). A woman who had previously had
small-pox, was infected by her husband.