London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Hammersmith 1902

Annual report of the Medical Officer of Health of the Borough of Hammersmith for the year 1902

This page requires JavaScript

56
comply with the provisions of this Section shall be liable for each
offence on conviction as aforesaid to a penalty not exceeding
Forty Shillings.
Proceedings for the recovery of the penalties shall be instituted
by the Sanitary Authority for the District in which the
offence was committed or of the District to the Medical Officer of
which such notification as aforesaid ought to have been made or
in which such itinerant vendor as aforesaid shall offer any such
commodity as aforesaid for sale as the case may be.
In accordance with my advice your Council decided
to instruct Sanitary Inspector S. Huggons Brown to act
as inspector for the purpose of these Bye-laws in
addition to the other duties as Smoke Inspector. He
has since been registering such premises. At the
present time there are 20 premises upon the register.
In 6 cases notices have been served, all of which have
been complied with.
SANITARY ADMINISTRATION IN THE BOROUGH
OF HAMMERSMITH.
Your Council having received a report dated June
27th, 1902, by Dr. Young, Assistant Medical Officer
of Health of the London County Council, on the
Sanitary administration of the Borough of Hammersmith,
your Public Health Committee instructed me to
report on the advice therein contained. On December
the 1st, I presented the following report.
Dec. 1st, 1902.
Gentlemen,
In accordance with the instruction which I received at
the last meeting of your Committee that I should carefully consider
and present to you a report on the Report by Dr. Young,
dated June 27th, 1902,
I beg to point out to you that the whole cause of the inquiry
and report was the fact that the late Vestry and your Council had
for a very considerable period delayed in adopting the advice
contained in several of my reports in reference to the adequacy of
the Sanitary Staff. Had your Council earlier adopted the course
which you have since unanimously followed, I assume that the
London County Council would not have deemed it to be necessary
to instruct their officer to report upon the matter.