London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Battersea 1900

Report upon the public health & sanitary condition of Battersea during the year1900

This page requires JavaScript

Clerkenwell, Hackney, Holborn, Kensington, Newington,
Paddington, Poplar, Rotherhithe, St. George-in-the-East,
St. Luke Middlesex, St. Marylebone, St.
Saviour Southwark, St. Pancras and Shoreditch. —No
action taken.
Bethnal Green, Lee, Limehouse, Mile End, St. Martin
in-the-Fields, Strand and Woolwich. —No reply received.
In view of the lack of general support shown in the
opinions expressed the subject was temporarily abandoned
by this authority, but has subsequently been revived by the
London County Council, who have recently asked for the
views of this authority as to the desirability of extending
to Measles, as apart from the provisions contained in
Section 54 of the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, those
contained in Sections 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 72,
73 and 74 of that Act, and in accordance with the instructions
of the Health Committee, I submitted the following report
which was directed to be forwarded to the London County
Council:—
Public Health Department,
Municipal Buildings,
Lavender Hill, S.W.
17th December, 1900.
Gentlemen,
In accordance with the instructions of the Health
Committee at their last meeting I beg to report upon
the letter from the London County Council asking for the
views of this Sanitary Authority as to the desirability
of extending to Measles the provisions contained in Sections
60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 72, 73 and 74 of the
Public Health (London) Act, 1891.
The late Vestry on numerous occasions expressed
their opinion as to the desirability of Measles being
notifiable, and 1 now re-endorse that recommendation with