Hints from the Health Department. Leaflet from the archive of the Society of Medical Officers of Health. Credit: Wellcome Collection, London
Thirty-eighth annual report on the sanitary condition of the Strand District, London
This page requires JavaScript
17 7
stances examined, in spite of the fact that the samples
of it constitute more than one-third of the total number
dealt with.
The following Table II. shows the number of milk
samples found adulterated and the nature and extent of
the adulteration.
TABLE II.
No. of Samples. | Percentage of Extraneous Water | Percentage of Fat Extracted. | Remarks. |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 3 | ||
2 | 4 | — | |
3 | 5 | — | One contained Boracic Acid. |
1 | 6 | — | |
L | 7 | — | |
4 | 8 | _ | |
1 | 10 | — | |
1 | 12 | — | |
1 | 14 | — | |
1 | 18 | — | |
1 | — | 10 | |
1 | 5 | 30 | |
1 | 8 | 14 | |
1 | 9 | 20 | Contained Boracic Acid |
In addition to this, 17 samples were of inferior
quality, 6 of which contained boracic acid, and 2 further
samples which were of good quality, also contained that
preservative.
Finally, 3 samples were abnormal. They contained
excessive quantities of fat, viz.:—9.64, 7.20 and 5.64
per cent., the last sample being so inferior in other
respects that, judged by ordinary standards, it contained
at least 9 per cent. of added water. As was the case