London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Lambeth 1895

Report on vital and sanitary statistics of the Parish of Lambeth during the year 1895...

This page requires JavaScript

66
This method of giving the mortality from any given
disease as a percentage of the total deaths is fallacious,
dealing as it does with two variable factors. It is preferable,
therefore, to state the mortalities of different diseases or
groups of diseases as percentages, or per 1,000 of the persons
living, i.e., of the population enumerated or estimated for
the time being; or in the case of deaths under one year,
these may be (as I have shewn) expressed in terms of the
total number of births. This latter method I have also
adopted with reference to deaths from (1) suffocation
whilst in bed with parents, and (2) premature births—such
deaths being generally in infants under one year of age
{see Table T.). In this way a more trustworthy comparison
can be made between the different incidences of diseases in
the various Registration Sub-districts of Lambeth, and a
careful study of the following Table T is interesting.

Taking the enumerated Populations of the various Registration Sub-districts for Lambeth as given at the Census 1896, and the estimated Populations for the middle of the year 1895, it will be seen that the differences may be disregarded, and the rates throughout this Report accepted, for all practical purposes, as the following table shews:—

Estimated Population (Middle 1895) from Censuses 1891 and 1896.Estimated Pop-ula'ion (Middle 1895) from Censuses 1891 and 1881.Under Estimated. (Per Cent.)Over Estimated. (Per Cent.)
Waterloo Road, 1st14166134485.3
Waterloo Road, 2nd14284137983.5
Lambeth Church, 1st18665171778.7
Lambeth Church, 2nd40705386515.3
Kenningion, 1st52200530331.6
Kennington, 2nd42695417132.4
Brixton80510782932.8
Norwood2874528772.09
Lambeth2919702848852.5