London's Pulse: Medical Officer of Health reports 1848-1972

View report page

Battersea 1897

Report upon the public health and sanitary condition of the Parish of St. Mary, Battersea...

This page requires JavaScript

113
of the London County Council with reference to the licensing
of slaughter-houses and cow-houses, that there were before
such Committee eight applications' for the renewal of cowhouse
licenses, and ten for slaughter-houses, all of which were
renewed, except as to 82, Usk Road. The license for this
slaughter-house was objected to by the Council's officer on the
ground that a condition attached to the license had been disregarded,
in that cattle had been slaughtered, when the license
was granted only for the slaughtering of pigs. The fact
was also submitted to the Licensing Committee, that when
a Sub-Committee of the Health Committee of the Vestry
visited the premises, the Bye-Laws of the London County
Council relative to the conduct of the business of a slaughterer of
cattle were being contravened, and also that a very large
number of pigs were slaughtered on the premises in question.
The Committee of the Council thereupon decided not to renew
the license.
351 York Road. In this case objection was made to the
renewal of the license by the Council's officer on the ground that
portions of the premises not controlled by the license had been
used for the purpose of the business of a slaughterer of cattle,
and the Committee also took into consideration the question the
Health Committee had raised, that in their opinion not more than
40 pigs were to be slaughtered in one day. The Licensing Committee
renewed the license upon the condition that not
more than 40 pigs should be slaughtered in one day, and that only
the licensed portions of the premises were to be used for the conduct
of the business in future.
He also submitted report with reference to a complaint of
offensive smells which were alleged to emanate from the ventilating
shaft in connection with the drainage of a paper mill, that
although the drains had been tested, no defect, had been discovered
therein, and that it would appear to arise from the misuse of the
sanitary conveniences by the workpeople employed, in that
h